some useless crap to know

We are ready to represent the best custom lab reports writing assistance that can cope with any task like some useless crap to know even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like some useless crap to know in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.

Gratz v Bollinger was a Supreme Court case brought on by white unadmitted University of Michigan applicants. The plantiffs, Jennifer Gratz, and Patrick Hamacher, both applied to the University between 15-18, when the University was using different grids and admissions criteria for white and minority groups. Both plantiff’s were put on the waiting list and went on to attend other universities. The plantiff’s are suing for an injunction which would no longer allow the University to use such a practice where as different criteria was used to measure different races. At the district court level held that the University raced based admissions between 15 and 18 violated both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI. It also ruled that the new system in affect since 1 was lawful and therefore denied the plantiffs’ request for an injunction barring the University from using race and ethnic status is admission decisions. In the end the Supreme Court again rejected the plantiffs’ pleas. For the reasons set forth in Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court has today rejected petitioners’ argument that diversity cannot constitute a compelling state interest. However, the Court finds that the University’s current policy, which automatically distributes 0 points, or one-fifth of the points needed to guarantee admission, to every single “underrepresented minority” applicant solely because of race, is not narrowly tailored to achieve educational diversity. Based on this decision the court ruled that the distribution of 0 points to every minority as the current admission system was doing violates the Equal Protection Clause. So at the Supreme Court level the decision of the lower district court was both reverse in part and remanded.


The above information was found using the two main resources, Findlaw and Cornell. While I used Findlaw first I found in the end Cornell to be a better resource for finding a brief history of the case. At Findlaw I was forced to read through the whole petition filed and sort through the important facts, while at Cornell I quickly came across a brief overview of the case and decision. Findlaw might be useful when looking to find the actual text as presented in a pdf file but I belief that for simple brief overviews of different cases I would continue to use Cornell in the future. Findlaw also seems like it would hold some value if u are looking for more than just Supreme Court cases where as I think the underlying reason for the website’s existence looks to be a commercial site where you can locate a lawyer in your area for your individual need. Overall I would give Cornell an A and FindLaw a B-.


When surveying other internet resources, Oyez made a good first impression just by the sheer fact that the case we are looking at for this assignment is on the main page with a link to the actual oral arguments presented before the Supreme Court. Overall Oyez seemed to offer the more technology that was missing from the first two research sites. At the same time though the addition of other featured such as available to listen to certain oral arguments didn’t take away from the sites ability to give a browser enough information for him to read up on the case as well. Overall I think Oyez deserves an A.


The second site I went to was the Federal Judiciary Home Page which immediately linked me to the Supreme Court Webpage. The site seemed useful about


Write my paper for me!!!


Mind that the sample papers like some useless crap to know presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!