Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Daniel Wilson's Review "The St. Lawrence and the Saguenay"

We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like Daniel Wilson's Review "The St. Lawrence and the Saguenay" even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like Daniel Wilson's Review "The St. Lawrence and the Saguenay" in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.



As I read the review of “The St. Lawrence and the Saguenay” by Sir Daniel Wilson, I found that Mr. Wilson enjoyed the poem and felt very strongly about its content, good and bad. He starts off his review by giving a recap of poetry, suggesting its nature and origin in relation to Canada. He then begins to analyze the poem, giving examples from the poem to further emphasize his points. He does this affectively by using detailed descriptions, thus is able to explain the various historical connections within the poem. He’s very knowledgeable of the poem and it’s contents, and this helps him as he continues on in his review. He then begins to express his concerns for the poem, but still notes that it contains pieces of great Canadian writing. He continues on, despite his concerns, expressing his thoughts on Mr. Sangster, and how he still delivers a interesting look at the great St. Lawrence and Saguenay rivers history. Wilson liked the poem, although he does hint that it may be historically misleading, seemingly referring to its contents as old views, not new. He concludes his review by quoting some favorite stanza’s from the poem, then explains his thoughts on these stanza’s, and on the poem as a whole.


Wilson’s review was very honest. I could tell he felt very strong about the remarks he was making towards the poem. I also found his use of similes very affective, and noticed how their purpose was to help his reader understand him and where he is coming from that much better. His writing style is unique, but not confusing. I did, however, have a little trouble making the same historical connections he was making, but that is mostly due to my lack of knowledge of poetry and its history. Wilson argues that the poem lacks strength and deepness which he believes is necessary. I believe he feels that the poem is more a representation of the rivers as what they are, rather than what they mean to Canadians. This is evident when he says this about the poem, “It is a pleasant and tasteful depiction of the scenes and associations of our noble river, written in the same stanza as ‘Childe Harold’, and with some echo of its mode of thought, though lacking the force and pathos of its passionate utterances.” I agree with Wilson to a certain extend, including his comments on the poems style, but I don’t believe that Sangster perhaps wanted his poem to be read that way. Wilson approaches this poem knowing of all the historical connections related to the rivers, including depressing ones. Whether right or wrong, it then affected his review of the poem in the sense that he begins to link those connections to it, causing him to perhaps misinterpret what Sangster was ultimately trying to express. This is just how I saw the review, and may very well not be the case, but I like the poem for what it is, and care not to analyze it to the extend of Mr. Wilson. I prefer to just enjoy the pleasant thoughts the poem presents. To conclude, I enjoyed Mr. Wilson’s review. I found it very insightful and informative. Although I disagreed at points, I found myself at least understanding his opinions of the poem, and his thoughts on Sangster’s writing style. As for the poem itself, it definitely had different meanings to me than it did to Wilson, but at least we can agree on the beautiful descriptions in the poem, and it’s significance to Canadian literature, “though it has in it none of those magical passages which stir the heart like the sound of a trumpet, it will nevertheless make an agreeable return to the tourist for the small space it claims in his baggage.”


Sangster, Charles, “The St. Lawrence and The Saguenay”, Kingston Creighton, 1856


Wilson, Daniel, “Review of Sangster’s The St. Lawrence and the Saguenay”





Mind that the sample papers like Daniel Wilson's Review "The St. Lawrence and the Saguenay" presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!

No comments:

Post a Comment